Google Faces Class Action Lawsuit

When discrimination occurs in a systematic way and is directed toward a protected group within a company, it could result in a class action suit against that company. In the case of Google, female workers allege that the company has methodically discriminated against them, and they point to alleged pay disparities to make their point. Beyond the compensation issue, the women claim they were denied opportunities for growth within the company.

Google’s Payment Structure

According to the lawsuit, Google has a compensation policy based on an employee’s position on one of several ladders. These ladders are arranged by job classification and skills, and compensation for a particular ladder increases within the ladder’s parameters as the employee advances.

Claims of Inequity

The plaintiffs assert that when hired, women in all areas of the company were placed on lower rungs of ladders than males who had equivalent experience. In some cases, the women say that they were placed on different ladders altogether, despite being responsible for essentially the same work and exhibiting similar skill sets. The results were threefold:

  • Women received significantly lower compensation than men based on their placement on a particular ladder
  • Men who were placed on parallel ladders for similar work were compensated at a higher rate than women with equivalent skills
  • The ladders made it impossible for females to ever catch up to the earnings of their male counterparts, with overall lesser earning potential over a period of time

State and Federal Law

California state law eclipses the requirements of the federal Equal Pay Act with regard to equal pay requirements. According to these laws, employers must pay equivalent wages to employees who perform markedly similar work, regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity. In California, ensuring this equity has been a goal pursued with aggression.

What Does the Law Provide in Such Cases?

If the plaintiffs prevail in this case, they may be entitled to be awarded a combination of damages:

  • The difference between their salary and that of males who performed similar work
  • Liquidated damages
  • Interest on lost wages
  • Costs associated with attorney’s fees and litigation in court.

Although Google prevailed in the original case, women have revised the complaint this year in order to narrow it to include only females working as engineers, managers, and caretakers in the employee nursery.

Google retorts that one in five of its engineers is female, and one in four managers and leaders is female. They contend that they have broad systems in place in order to ensure equity across all groups in terms of pay. How will the courts decide? Time will tell.

Fighting Discrimination

Whether it is gender discrimination or another type of workplace bias that you are fighting, the experienced legal team at HKM can help. Contact us in Los Angeles for a personal consultation today.

HKM Employment Attorneys LLP

700 South Flower Street
Suite 1067, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Phone: 213-769-6522

Los Angeles Practice Areas

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Lopez v. Stellae International Inc.

HKM Employment Attorneys representa a Soraida Lopez Rivas, una trabajadora que está demandando a Stellae International Inc. por no pagar salarios semanalmente como lo exige la Ley Laboral de Nueva York.
– HKM Employment Attorneys represents Soraida Lopez Rivas, a worker who is suing Stellae International Inc. for its failure to pay wages on a weekly basis as required by New York Labor Law.

Read More »