California Whistleblower Protections

Do you question the scruples of your employer? Are you suspicious that certain policies and/or actions may break state or federal laws? Are shady practices cheating competitors or other organizations out of their fair profits? If so, are you considering blowing the whistle? Such action comes with certain dangers. Some employers do not take kindly to reports revealing their unprincipled practices, but you should know that both state and federal laws protect whistleblowers from employer retaliation. A good employment attorney can assist you in your endeavors to make things right.

Case in Point: Melody Jo Samuelson

When psychologist Melody Jo Samuelson testified that she had been compelled to use dubious testing methods in order to push patients into the justice system before they were mentally competent, Napa State Hospital in California fired her. Samuelson fought the retaliatory action in court, and wound up winning a million dollar verdict.

Whistleblower Claims

Although California is an at-will state where the majority of employees may be terminated without explanation, there are exceptions to the rule. One such exception involves a California statute protecting employees who reveal or report violations of common law public policy or illegal activity. This may include employees who:

  • Choose not to violate laws;
  • Perform legal obligations despite employer protestations;
  • Exercise constitutional rights at the consternation of employers;
  • Suspect violations of state or federal laws;
  • Report violations of state or federal statutes to workplace, government, or legal authorities.

Employers may not create or exercise policies limiting employee disclosures in order to intimidate employees or prevent or justify the quelling of complaints.  Furthermore, workers who are fired or otherwise experience retaliation for such reporting or testifying may file a complaint against employers. Violation reports must be made to law enforcement agencies and/or government agencies in order to be protected.

Presenting Your Case

Your prima facie case will encompass the following elements:

  • You are an employee/individual covered by statutory or common law;
  • Your employer is covered by said laws;
  • Your employer knew of the situation;
  • Retaliation was prompted by your participation in protected activities;
  • You suffered discrimination and/or termination;
  • You would not have experienced discrimination/termination had you chosen not to engage in protected activities.

Statutes of Limitations

The amount of time between the retaliatory action and the filing of a complaint is limited depending on the claim and the agency with which it is filed. In general, lawsuits must be filed within two years of retaliatory events. Suits involving Occupational Safety and Health have a six-month statute of limitations, and those involving Workers’ Compensation have a one-year limit. Some federal limits are as short as one month! Each case has its own intricacies and exceptions; working with an employment attorney at HKM to ensure you file within the accepted deadlines is a good idea. Our team understands state and federal statutes and will fight aggressively to protect your interests. Contact us today in Los Angeles for a personalized consultation.

HKM Employment Attorneys LLP

700 South Flower Street
10th Floor, Suite 1067
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Phone: 213-769-6522

Los Angeles Practice Areas

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Milwaukee, Wisconsin’s April 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

April 2026 Labor Law Updates for Milwaukee, Wisconsin Wisconsin’s April 2026 employment update included new worker’s compensation changes, a workforce-access law for DACA recipients, state training-grant activity, and federal rulemaking that could affect joint employment analysis. This roundup is designed for Wisconsin employees, HR professionals, compliance leaders, and employers tracking

Read More »

San Jose, California’s April 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

April 2026 Labor Law Updates for San Jose, California California’s April 2026 employment update included major wage-and-hour rulings, PAGA and arbitration decisions, labor relations litigation, and state and federal enforcement actions involving worker misclassification, harassment, retaliation, and hiring discrimination. This roundup is designed for California employees, HR professionals, compliance leaders,

Read More »

San Francisco, California’s April 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

April 2026 Labor Law Updates for San Francisco, California California’s April 2026 employment update included major wage-and-hour rulings, PAGA and arbitration decisions, labor relations litigation, and state and federal enforcement actions involving worker misclassification, harassment, retaliation, and hiring discrimination. This roundup is designed for California employees, HR professionals, compliance leaders,

Read More »