Providence Health & Services Ordered to Pay Over $229 Million in Landmark Wage Violation Verdict

Jury finds systemic wage violations for more than 33,000 hourly employees in Washington state based on unlawful timeclock rounding and second meal period violations.

SEATTLE, WA — The judgment in Bennett, et. al v. Providence Health & Services, was entered in King County Superior Court today, the culmination of a two-week trial which took place late last month. Providence is ordered to pay more than 33,000 of its hourly employees more than $229 million, exposing years of wage violations due to unlawful time rounding and meal period violations.

The class-action complaint was initially filed in 2021 on behalf of Providence nurses, technicians, medical assistants, and other hourly caregivers. It alleged Providence both systematically denied statutorily required second meal periods and consistently underpaid workers by using an unlawful timeclock rounding policy. An analysis of timeclock and pay records of hourly workers found that over the course of 5 years, Providence failed to pay for more than 234,000 hours of time worked.

The jury awarded $90.3 million for unpaid and missed second meal breaks, with an additional $9.3 million for unpaid wages due to rounding. Just over $1.3 million was deducted based on employees who knowingly waived their second meal breaks. The total damages were doubled due to the Court’s summary judgement ruling in January of this year, which found Providence willfully committed these wage violations. Statutory interest brings the total owed to more than $229 million.

“It was a good day for healthcare workers in Washington,” said Jason Rittereiser, managing partner of HKM’s Seattle office who represented the healthcare workers. “This verdict will impact workers not just in Washington but throughout the country. It sends a clear message to healthcare corporations everywhere: if you withhold wages from your employees, you will be held accountable.”

The 33,000 health care workers in the class are represented by HKM Employment Attorneys and Peter Stutheit of Stutheit Kalin, LLC. The class is comprised of all hourly workers employed at Providence in Washington state who lost wages due to these practices between September 2018 and May 2023.

More information can be found at hkm.com/bennett-v-providence/.

CONTACT:

HKM Employment Attorneys LLP
www.hkm.com

Ali O’Neil
(206) 960-4492

HKM Employment Attorneys LLP

600 Stewart Street
Suite 901
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206-838-2504

Seattle Practice Areas

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Washington, D.C.’s December 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

December 2025 Labor Law Updates for Washington, D.C. This roundup highlights the most significant employment, labor, and workplace rights developments during December 2025 that matter to employers, HR professionals, and employees in Washington, D.C. It includes federal court rulings and federal agency actions that influence the District’s labor law environment.

Read More »

Cincinnati, Ohio’s December 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

December 2025 Labor Law Updates for Cincinnati, Ohio December 2025 saw several notable developments affecting Ohio workplaces — from municipal pay transparency rules in Columbus to pending state E-Verify legislation and local anti-discrimination protections. Meanwhile, high-impact federal case law like Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services continues shaping employers’

Read More »

Charlotte, North Carolina’s December 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

December 2025 Labor Law Updates for Charlotte, North Carolina December 2025 in North Carolina labor and employment law saw significant litigation activity — particularly the federal court decision upholding class and collective certification in a misclassification suit — and continued policy modernization of state hiring practices. Employers and HR teams

Read More »