Washington is an At-Will Employment State

Let’s imagine that an employee makes a mistake. A few days later, the employee makes the same mistake again. The supervisor calls the employee into her office and warns her that making the same mistake constantly can cause serious problems for the company. The supervisor tells the employee to double check her work before submitting it. A few weeks later, the employee makes the same mistake again. This compels the company to perform damage control and make numerous corrections. The following day, the human resource department calls the employee and informs her that her employment with the company has been terminated, effective immediately.

At Will Employment

Washington state is an “at will” employment state, which means that either the employer or employee may terminate an employment relationship at any time. This also means that an employer can terminate the employee’s employment without providing a reason. Therefore, absent an employment contract specifying terms of employment termination, the employment is at will.

Exceptions

There are exceptions to at will employment wherein an employer may be in the wrong for terminating an employee. Here are examples:

Discrimination

Washington law makes it illegal to fire someone on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, pregnancy, religion, disability, age, marital status, AIDS / HIV or sickle cell traits. Specifically, an employer may not refuse to hire or fire someone based on these traits. Similarly, an employer may not skew compensation or print materials that suggest that the employer will discriminate based on these traits.

To file a complaint, a prospective, current or former employee files a complaint with the Washington State Human Rights Commission, or WSHRC. Once received, the WSHRC conducts an investigation into the matter. The complaint must allege a complaint that demonstrates discrimination. The employer will have the chance to explain why, from its point of view, there was no discrimination. The potential, current or former employee will then be compelled to provide additional information that shows discrimination.

Breach of Contract

Washington law allows for an employee to sign a contract with an employer with terms that are for cause. That is to say, an employee can agree with an employer that employment termination only occurs for cause. If this is the case, an employer can fire an employee only if the employer has a compelling reason. In such an instance, the employee can sue the employer for breach of contract and attain a damages award.

Retaliation

Washington law prohibits employers from punishing prospective and current employees for filing a complaint against the employer. If an employee files a complaint against his or her employer and the employer reacts by firing the employee, the employer committed retaliation.

There are common law protections as well. If the termination violates public policy, e.g. an employer who tells an employee to commit perjury or be fired or an employee who invokes his right to collect workers’ compensation, then the employer cannot terminate based on those events because it violates public policy.

Need an employment lawyer in Seattle? Contact HKM Employment Attorneys.

HKM Employment Attorneys LLP

600 Stewart Street
Suite 901
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206-838-2504

Seattle Practice Areas

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Orange County, California’s July 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of July 2026 Labor Law Updates for Orange County, California July brought several important developments in California labor law, including new wage requirements for health care workers, significant appellate rulings involving arbitration and remote employees, and federal enforcement actions involving California employers. This July 2026 employment update from HKM

Read More »

Riverside, California’s July 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of July 2026 Labor Law Updates for Riverside, California July brought several important developments in California labor law, including new wage requirements for health care workers, significant appellate rulings involving arbitration and remote employees, and federal enforcement actions involving California employers. This July 2026 employment update from HKM Employment

Read More »

San Jose, California’s July 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

July 2026 Labor Law Updates for San Jose, California July brought several important developments in California labor law, including new wage requirements for health care workers, significant appellate rulings involving arbitration and remote employees, and federal enforcement actions involving California employers. This July 2026 employment update from HKM Employment Attorneys

Read More »