At-Will Employment

Washington State, like most states, is an at-will state with respect to labor and employment issues. This means that an employer can terminate the contract of an employee “at-will” without recourse. An employer can terminate an employee for no good cause, provided that the termination was not based on discrimination.

To circumvent at-will employee status, there is a strategy that an employee can take, which is contracting as a “for cause” employee. This article will discuss this strategy.

Discrimination

Washington State law provides that the following scenarios are protected regarding at-will termination:

Note that these protections only apply to a Washington state employer that has eight or more employees. Also note that these protections apply to anti-retaliation, as well. This means that an employee who files a complaint, based on protected status, with the HR department of his or her company cannot face backlash for filing that statement.

Similarly, facing retaliation for complaining of an illegal action is against state law.

Contract

One way to avoid being an at-will employee is to contractually obligate the employer to only terminate for good cause. This would require a written contract saying as such. Such a contract would be upheld in court.

Even if the employer does not verbally commit to an at-will contract, an employment contract will often state that it is at-will. One should check the employee handbook from his or her employer.

Similarly, a term contract can remove an employee from an at-will status. For instance, signing a contract that an employee will work for three years and termination will only result for criminal acts or failing a drug test will bind the employer to the terms of that contract.

Oral Contract

Sometimes, the law is gray, especially with respect to oral contracts. As mentioned, the general rule is that an employee is at-will. However, an employer who tells an employee “you can have this job until you retire” might be creating an oral contract wherein the employee is a for-cause employee. If the employer made such statements numerous times, then there is a more compelling claim for cause status.

Even in these situations, an employer will usually rely on the initial employment contract that the employee is at-will and will claim that there was no intent to modify the original terms of the contract. In situations in which the employee finds him or herself fired, he or she should speak with an experienced and knowledgeable labor law attorney.

Facing employment issues? Contact a law firm that has the experience and knowledge in Washington State labor law. Contact the HKM law firm.

HKM Employment Attorneys LLP

600 Stewart Street
Suite 901
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206-838-2504

Seattle Practice Areas

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania’s March 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of March 2026 Labor Law Updates for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania March 2026 brought several notable labor and employment developments relevant to Pennsylvania employees, HR professionals, and business leaders. This roundup from HKM Employment Attorneys highlights significant court rulings, restrictive covenant litigation, and broader workplace-rights developments affecting Pennsylvania workplaces. March 2026

Read More »

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania’s March 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

March 2026 Labor Law Updates for Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania March 2026 brought several notable labor and employment developments relevant to Pennsylvania employees, HR professionals, and business leaders. This roundup from HKM Employment Attorneys highlights significant court rulings, restrictive covenant litigation, and broader workplace-rights developments affecting Pennsylvania workplaces. March 2026 showed that

Read More »

Phoenix, Arizona’s March 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of March 2026 Labor Law Updates for Phoenix, Arizona March 2026 brought a mix of proposed legislation, labor-policy developments, and broader employment law issues relevant to Arizona employers and workers. This roundup from HKM Employment Attorneys highlights key Arizona labor law and workplace rights developments for employees, HR professionals,

Read More »