Washington, D.C.’s May 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of May 2025’s Labor Law Cases in Washington, D.C.

Here’s a roundup of key labor and employment decisions in May 2025 in D.C. that impact employees, HR professionals, and businesses:

National Urban League et al. v. Trump — U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Case No. 25‑471)

Date decided: May 2, 2025

Summary: Plaintiffs (National Urban League and others) sought a preliminary injunction to block enforcement of Executive Orders related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) certification under EO 14173. They argued the requirements were vague and infringed on First Amendment speech rights.

Ruling: The D.C. District Court denied the request, allowing enforcement of DEI-related executive orders to proceed during ongoing legal challenges.

Implications:

Employers with federal contracts must maintain DEI programs, at least temporarily. The decision underscores ongoing legal uncertainty and highlights potential First Amendment challenges around DEI mandates for federally supported entities.

Supreme Court — Stay on Reinstatement for Gwynne Wilcox & Cathy Harris (NLRB & MSPB)

Date decided: May 22, 2025

Summary: The Supreme Court issued a 6–3 unsigned stay in emergency appeals related to firings of independent-agency members—NLRB’s Gwynne Wilcox and MSPB’s Cathy Harris—following President Trump’s removal actions challenging Humphrey’s Executor precedent.

Ruling: The stay prevents their reinstatement pending further briefing, citing probable presidential authority to remove officials who exercise executive power. The Court did not rule on the broader constitutional question.

Implications:

This stay prolongs NLRB and MSPB quorum vacancies, affecting federal labor agency operations. It signals potential weakening of independent-agency protections and may reshape future employment litigation tied to agency independence.

Conclusion: Looking back on Washington, D.C. Labor Cases in May 2025

May 2025’s key D.C. employment rulings highlight critical issues surrounding DEI mandates and presidential removal powers affecting labor agencies. These decisions directly impact government contractors, labor unions, and HR professionals navigating federal compliance and workforce protections. If you’re dealing with federal contracts, DEI obligations, or agency governance questions, it’s crucial to stay informed as these cases move forward.

For concerns about similar legal matters or to explore how these developments might affect your organization in Washington, D.C., contact staff at HKM Law. We’re here to help.

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Portland, Oregon’s September 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of September 2025 Labor Law Updates for Portland, Oregon This monthly update highlights key legislative changes, administrative developments, and court rulings from Oregon in September 2025 that affect employment and labor law. It is intended for employees, HR professionals, compliance leaders, and employers and is brought to you by

Read More »

Phoenix, Arizona’s September 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of September 2025 Labor Law Updates for Phoenix, Arizona This monthly roundup presents the most notable labor and employment news in Arizona for September 2025, geared toward employees, HR professionals, and compliance stakeholders. Brought to you by HKM Employment Attorneys’ Arizona team. September 2025 was more of a legislative

Read More »

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania’s September 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of September 2025 Labor Law Updates for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania This monthly roundup highlights the latest labor and employment developments in Pennsylvania for September 2025. It’s intended for HR professionals, employment counsel, compliance officers, and workers. Though September 2025 lacked blockbuster labor or discrimination decisions in Pennsylvania, the state remains

Read More »