Restaurant Sued For Removing Accommodation

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is suing a Houston restaurant for disability discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation. In many cases of disability discrimination, an employer fails to consider a disabled applicant or fails to provide reasonable accommodations so that the qualified applicant can perform required duties. In this case, however, the restaurant, Nick’s Restaurant and Sports Bar, not only hired a disabled applicant; it also provided reasonable and workable accommodations.

Unfortunately, a change in management altered the situation dramatically. Laura Kercheval, who has a form of dwarfism, was working for Nick’s as a server. Nick’s provided a lower workstation for her to pick up her trays from the bar. This accommodation likely caused minimal changes for the bar staff and allowed Kercheval to work safely. But, Nick’s new general manager decided to end the
accommodations and told Kercheval to use the main bar counter like all the other servers. To make the situation worse, Kercheval claims Nick’s owner also made unwanted sexual advances, comments, and physical contact. As a result of Kercheval’s repeated complaints and requests for accommodations, her hours were reduced and she was eventually terminated. The EEOC is bringing the case on behalf of Kercheval and seeks back pay and damages for her, as well as an order prohibiting Nick’s from further discriminatory and retaliatory actions.

Investigations Into Discrimination

Employers are prohibited from discriminating in employment against qualified individuals on any of the protected grounds. These protected grounds are numerous, and include age, race, gender, and disability on a federal level.

Employees who believe discrimination or harassment is either happening to them or others can report their complaints and, in some cases, the EEOC. Individuals have about six months from the date of the last discriminatory action to file a discrimination complaint under both state and federal discrimination laws; however, the EEOC extends the deadline to 300 days if the state has a law prohibiting the same discrimination as WLAD.

Once a complaint is filed, the agency in charge, the EEOC, will investigate the complaint. This investigation can include reviewing documents from the complainant, interviewing witnesses and other employees, and visiting the workplace. If there is not enough evidence found, the complaint may be dismissed or the agency, in the case of the EEOC, will provide the individual with a notice allowing that person to file a lawsuit. If there is evidence of discrimination though, the agency will attempt to resolve the matter between the individual and employer through mediation. If mediation fails, as in the Houston case, the agency may take the case to trial on behalf of the individual.

If you believe you have suffered from discrimination in your employment or your company is facing investigation, an experienced HKM employment law attorney in Houston can help.

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania’s March 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of March 2026 Labor Law Updates for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania March 2026 brought several notable labor and employment developments relevant to Pennsylvania employees, HR professionals, and business leaders. This roundup from HKM Employment Attorneys highlights significant court rulings, restrictive covenant litigation, and broader workplace-rights developments affecting Pennsylvania workplaces. March 2026

Read More »

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania’s March 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

March 2026 Labor Law Updates for Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania March 2026 brought several notable labor and employment developments relevant to Pennsylvania employees, HR professionals, and business leaders. This roundup from HKM Employment Attorneys highlights significant court rulings, restrictive covenant litigation, and broader workplace-rights developments affecting Pennsylvania workplaces. March 2026 showed that

Read More »

Phoenix, Arizona’s March 2026 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of March 2026 Labor Law Updates for Phoenix, Arizona March 2026 brought a mix of proposed legislation, labor-policy developments, and broader employment law issues relevant to Arizona employers and workers. This roundup from HKM Employment Attorneys highlights key Arizona labor law and workplace rights developments for employees, HR professionals,

Read More »