Summary of May 2025’s Labor Law Cases in Idaho
There were 2 significant labor and employment decisions handed down in Idaho in May 2025 which are relevant to employees, HR professionals, and Idaho businesses alike. They highlight key developments in workers’ compensation and unemployment benefits.
Arellano v. Sunrise Homes, Inc. — Idaho Supreme Court (Docket No. 49695)
Date decided: May 19, 2025
Summary: Roofer Saul Arellano was injured after falling from a roof while working for Sunrise Homes, Inc. He lacked fall protection and then filed a workers’ compensation claim.
Ruling: The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed that Arellano was entitled to benefits under the workers’ compensation statute. The court denied Sunrise Homes’ summary judgment attempt, ruling that the exclusive remedy rule did not bar Arellano’s claim.
Implications:
This decision reinforces injured workers’ rights to compensation even in situations involving significant employer or employee negligence, and clarifies Idaho’s stance on “exclusive remedy” defenses within the context of workplace safety lapses.
Flynn v. Sun Valley Brewing Company — Idaho Supreme Court (Docket No. 50921)
Date decided: May 13, 2025
Summary: Sean C. Flynn was laid off by Sun Valley Brewing during the COVID‑19 pandemic and subsequently filed for unemployment benefits in March 2020. The core legal issue was whether his separation constituted a “willful” act under Idaho Code § 72‑1366(12), which could disqualify him from benefits.
Ruling: The Supreme Court clarified that “willful” requires deliberate and intentional conduct and did not apply to Flynn’s layoff. Flynn was entitled to unemployment benefits .
Implications:
Employers should understand that layoffs—even if precipitated by an employee’s own decision or misunderstanding—do not automatically trigger a benefits disqualification. This ruling may impact how pandemic-era separations are treated by Idaho’s Industrial Commission.
Conclusion: Looking back on Idaho Labor Cases in May 2025
May 2025 was notable for decisions that reaffirm workers’ rights in Idaho. The Arellano ruling affirms employees’ access to workers’ compensation even in risky, safety-compromised situations. Meanwhile, Flynn clarifies eligibility for unemployment benefits, setting a threshold for what constitutes “willful” separation. Both decisions are critical for Idaho labor law practitioners, employers, and workers navigating claims related to workplace injury and job loss.
If you’d like assistance understanding how these cases might affect your workplace, or if you have questions about a similar situation, contact HKM—our team specializes in Idaho labor law and workplace rights.
