HIPAA and Britney Spears

We could not pass up an opportunity to mention Britney Spears here on our blog.  As reported in this article, UCLA Medical Center is imposing discipline against 13 employees who looked at Britney’s medical records without permission.  This seems to be a trend.  As reported here, 27 employees at Palisades Medical Center in North Bergen, New Jersey, were suspended back in October for viewing George Clooney’s medical records after a motorcycle accident.   

Why are hospitals so concerned and why can’t doctors and nurses snoop on their favorite celebrity?  The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).  Hospitals are required to protect the medical records for Britney, George, and any other patient.  Employers likewise are required to protect personal health information of employees.  Penalties for using patient information without prior consent could be subject to financial penalties as high as $250,000 or 10 years in jail, and the Department of Health and Human Services recently announced that it will conduct surprise audits of HIPAA compliance in hospitals. 

Can Britney Spears or George Clooney sue the hospitals for unauthorized access to their medical records?  The federal courts have said no, there is no private right of action under HIPAA.  But other theories of liability could potentially support a cause of action under state law, such as for breach of privacy or negligent infliction of emotional distress.  In addition, an employer who fails to protect its employees’ protected health information could see state law claims thrown into the mix and references to HIPAA privacy rights to bolster those state law claims. 

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Washington, D.C.’s December 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

December 2025 Labor Law Updates for Washington, D.C. This roundup highlights the most significant employment, labor, and workplace rights developments during December 2025 that matter to employers, HR professionals, and employees in Washington, D.C. It includes federal court rulings and federal agency actions that influence the District’s labor law environment.

Read More »

Cincinnati, Ohio’s December 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

December 2025 Labor Law Updates for Cincinnati, Ohio December 2025 saw several notable developments affecting Ohio workplaces — from municipal pay transparency rules in Columbus to pending state E-Verify legislation and local anti-discrimination protections. Meanwhile, high-impact federal case law like Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services continues shaping employers’

Read More »

Charlotte, North Carolina’s December 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

December 2025 Labor Law Updates for Charlotte, North Carolina December 2025 in North Carolina labor and employment law saw significant litigation activity — particularly the federal court decision upholding class and collective certification in a misclassification suit — and continued policy modernization of state hiring practices. Employers and HR teams

Read More »