Summary of May 2025’s Labor Law Cases in Georgia
May 2025 saw limited labor and employment law activity from Georgia’s appellate courts. However, one case of note involving an employee’s post-injury trial appeal was decided by the Georgia Court of Appeals. While not a traditional employment dispute (e.g., discrimination or wage claims), the case implicates workplace injury and employer liability following a vehicular accident.
Thomas v. Accurate Steel Rule Cutting Die, Inc. — Court of Appeals of Georgia (A25A0073)
Date decided: May 23, 2025
Summary: A delivery van driver employed by Accurate Steel Rule Cutting Die, Inc. was involved in a rear-end collision while on the job. He filed a negligence lawsuit against the other motorist, the vehicle’s owner, and their insurance companies, seeking compensation for injuries allegedly sustained in the crash. At trial in DeKalb County State Court, a jury awarded the driver $50,000 in damages. The driver sought a new trial or an increased damages award (additur), citing concerns about the opposing counsel’s closing arguments and the jury instructions given.
Ruling:The Court of Appeals upheld most of the trial court’s rulings, affirming that:
- The use of a computerized presentation by defense counsel during closing arguments did not constitute grounds for a new trial.
- The jury’s $50,000 award was supported by the evidence.
- The trial court did not commit a harmful legal error in rejecting one of the driver’s requested jury instructions.
However, the appellate court found that the trial court had applied the wrong legal standard when reviewing the driver’s motion for a new trial on general grounds. As a result, the case was affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further consideration under the correct legal framework.
Implications:
This case is relevant for Georgia workers injured while performing job duties, particularly those pursuing third-party negligence claims alongside (or in lieu of) workers’ compensation. It underscores the high burden for plaintiffs seeking to overturn jury verdicts and highlights procedural pitfalls in trial court review of post-verdict motions. While not a traditional employment dispute, it touches on the intersection of workplace injury litigation and appellate review.
Conclusion: Looking back on Georgia Labor Cases in May 2025
While May 2025 was a quiet month in Georgia labor law, the Thomas v. Accurate Steel ruling may have significant implications for the relatively complex context of employment law cases under appellate review.
If you have any questions about workplace injury claims or post-trial procedures in Georgia, contact the employment law attorneys at HKM Employment Attorneys LLP for a confidential consultation. We’re here to help you understand your rights and options under Georgia labor law.
