Confusion Surrounds Government Curbs on Executive Compensation

 

There has been a great deal of discussion recently on the need to address the widely-perceived problem of executive overcompensation.  The recent financial meltdown on Wall Street has intensified this discussion.  The federal government recently indicated that banks that accept cash infusions as part of the current financial bailout will be expected to comply with executive compensation provisions, including a “clawback” provision and prohibition on “golden parachutes.”  However, a closer look at those restrictions indicates that they are vague in language, and likely limited in scope.  The clawback provision, for example, only takes requires a corporate board not to pay a severance benefit if the benefit was based on “materially inaccurate” information.  Also, the provisions are not retroactive in scope.

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Lopez v. Stellae International Inc.

HKM Employment Attorneys representa a Soraida Lopez Rivas, una trabajadora que está demandando a Stellae International Inc. por no pagar salarios semanalmente como lo exige la Ley Laboral de Nueva York.
– HKM Employment Attorneys represents Soraida Lopez Rivas, a worker who is suing Stellae International Inc. for its failure to pay wages on a weekly basis as required by New York Labor Law.

Read More »