Baltimore, Maryland’s August 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of August 2025 Labor Law Updates for Baltimore, Maryland

Here are your August 2025 employment and labor law updates for Baltimore, brought to you by HKM employment attorneys. If you’re an HR professional, employer, or employee in Maryland, August 2025 brought significant clarifications in employment law that could impact both litigation risk and internal policies. Employers should review their layoff/RIF procedures, record-keeping, job reassignments, and practices for small increments of unpaid work time.

Fourth Circuit Decision on Adverse Employment Action — Court Ruling

Date: August 28, 2025

Summary:

A decision by the Fourth Circuit clarified how to assess what constitutes an “adverse employment action.” Under the standard set by Muldrow, an employee does not need to show a “significant detrimental effect” (such as loss of pay or demotion) to bring a claim; rather, showing some disadvantageous change in a term or condition of employment may suffice. In a case from Maryland, a plaintiff’s loss of supervisory responsibilities—even without a loss in pay or benefits—was deemed potentially an adverse action that requires further proceedings.

Implications:

For employees: there may be more viable claims over what had been thought of as more minor changes in job duties or status.
For employers: policies should anticipate that changes to responsibilities, even without pay cuts, may trigger claims. Performance reviews, transfers, and informal reassignments may need more documentation.

De Minimis Rule Applies to Maryland State Wage Laws — Court Ruling

Date: July 3 (but remains recent and heavily referenced through August)

Summary:
In the case Estefany Martinez v. Amazon.com Services LLC, the Supreme Court of Maryland held that the federal de minimis doctrine (meaning the law does not concern itself with trivial amounts of work/time) applies under Maryland’s Wage Payment and Collection Law and Maryland Wage & Hour Law. The question of how much time is “de minimis” is left for lower courts to define.

Implications:
Employers in Maryland can rely on de minimis time exemptions for small, hard-to-measure periods of work under state wage laws. Employees/claimants: claims for very small increments (seconds/minutes) may be dismissed under this doctrine. Policies should clarify how time is tracked and compensated to avoid ambiguity.

Proposed Regulations on MD Economic Stabilization Act / Mass Layoff / WARN-type Notices — Regulatory Development

Date: Reissued proposed regulations around August 2025 (public comments closed July 14, 2025)

Summary:
Maryland Department of Labor reissued proposed regulations to enforce the Economic Stabilization Act, which requires notice in mass layoffs or reductions in force. Key features include:

  • Sixty (60) days’ written notice required for certain mass layoffs / reductions in operations by employers of at least 50 employees.
  • Expanded definitions, especially relating to remote/virtual/tele-work employees, to clarify who counts under notice obligations.
  • Stronger enforcement tools and employer obligations, including how to calculate triggers.

Implications:
Employers should monitor finalization of these regulations; once in force, failing to provide proper notice can result in penalties or liabilities. Employers with remote/telework employees need to assess whether those employees are covered under these rules. HR departments should review layoff policies to ensure compliance (who counts, what notice must be given, etc.).

Conclusion: Looking Back on Maryland Labor Law Updates from August 2025

As Maryland courts issue critical rulings on wage disputes, wrongful termination, and federal-employee protections, your next step shouldn’t just be reading the news—it should be knowing your rights. At HKM Employment Attorneys in Baltimore, our experienced team specializes in advocating for employees across the state on issues from contract violations and unpaid wages to retaliation and whistleblowing claims. Whether you’re a federal worker navigating MSPB appeals or confronting workplace unfairness under Maryland law, we offer strategic legal guidance backed by attentive client care. If recent case outcomes have raised concerns for your job or benefits, contact our Baltimore office to discuss how we can help you protect your workplace rights.

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Portland, Oregon’s September 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of September 2025 Labor Law Updates for Portland, Oregon This monthly update highlights key legislative changes, administrative developments, and court rulings from Oregon in September 2025 that affect employment and labor law. It is intended for employees, HR professionals, compliance leaders, and employers and is brought to you by

Read More »

Phoenix, Arizona’s September 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of September 2025 Labor Law Updates for Phoenix, Arizona This monthly roundup presents the most notable labor and employment news in Arizona for September 2025, geared toward employees, HR professionals, and compliance stakeholders. Brought to you by HKM Employment Attorneys’ Arizona team. September 2025 was more of a legislative

Read More »

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania’s September 2025 Employment & Labor Law Cases

Summary of September 2025 Labor Law Updates for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania This monthly roundup highlights the latest labor and employment developments in Pennsylvania for September 2025. It’s intended for HR professionals, employment counsel, compliance officers, and workers. Though September 2025 lacked blockbuster labor or discrimination decisions in Pennsylvania, the state remains

Read More »