$4 Million Award to Former Executive in Non-Compete Dispute

I wrote a few words below about non-compete agreements and their proliferation.  Now comes a story about a company that must pay $4 Million for denying compensation to an executive who refused to sign a non-compete agreement.  Articles about the case can be found here and here.  In this particular situation, the employer (H&R Block) attempted to force its Chief Operating Office to sign a non-compete.  When the executive refused, the company denied payment of stock options and refused to pay contractually obligated severance pay.  The articles do not mention it, but presumably the company thought it could argue that refusal to sign the non-compete was sufficient cause to deny payment of the stock options and severance.  The award includes $3.01 million in compensatory damages, $466,565 in interest, and $481,910 in attorney’s fees.

Picture of Daniel Kalish

Daniel Kalish

A graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School, Mr. Kalish is an experienced trial lawyer who has tried more than thirty trials to jury verdict. Mr. Kalish’s practice focuses on complex trial work, and he represents employees in all aspects of employment litigation.

Learn More...

Related Posts

Military Spouse

You are the spouse of a member of the military. Not only has your spouse sacrificed for his or her country by always being ready to defend it, but you have sacrificed your family life for the country, as well. We thank you and salute you. In addition to our

Read More »

Colorado Leave Donation Programs: Know Your Rights

Many Colorado employers have programs that allow their employees to essentially donate their accrued paid time off (PTO), including sick leave and vacation days, to co-workers who are experiencing health or family emergencies or serious medical issues. Not only do these leave-donation programs promote the ultimate level of goodwill amongst

Read More »